I see the clouds in the trees, while on the freeway with a fellow Whittie, I think about it, if I were there, it would look ike fog. How could I go through a cloud and think of it as a cloud instead of fog? Maybe if it was only a part oof it sticking out, and I would have a choice to touch it or not. Yea, it would feel like mist, I mean and when I do go through fog, I shold already think of it for what it is, it is a cloud, (but they dont connect) because I must think of clouds as fragments of water, I must think of fog as water fragments in the air, I must think of fog as humid air, and clouds as humid air. And so I see a trailer on the freeway splashing water up from puddles, shooting water fragments to its sides, making the air on its sides humid, the truck had clouds chasing it on its sides. Before I would think its silly to think of it like this, but now I see how its true.
Nature of the threat: I am afraid, I will get upset if a certain thing happens, this is a sin, because we want to Live, we have already admitted that we want to Live, the question is, would you still want to live if this happened? Would you still love Life, would you still love existing, would you still love God if you had to go through this? I should not feel any threat, but live with a high esteem, and the best attitude, no matter what I go through, no matter what Life puts me through I will love it for the sake of God. I shall not feel threatened, even of the fact that others may be threatened, that others may judge, I may act against it, as they are assumptions, but I shall not feel any threat. So whatever the result may be, its all good, you work with it.
The thing that I was considering is that you cannot expect others, or you should not rely, depend, on others’ good nature, its something that I go by, because I have a thing about doing things myself, you can ask for a favor, but dont expect it to be done or exactly. Or if you forget your wallet somewhere, dont expect to gett it back, everyone has their own problems, and if you dont have any, you shouldnt expect the rest of the world to be perfect. And just like you dont expect others to be humble in this way, you shouldnt expect others to not expect high standards from you. And because you dont expect others to make it easy for you, its ok that others are judemental like this.
The book of Proverbs has so many good advice for the general man to follow. They make sense, and seem to be natural consideration. But you cant expect everyone to have read Proverbs and to know common sense. So if someone pukes in your car, dont think bad of them, or as idiots, cuz they may know something you dont, they may have a philosophy that makes their actions make sense, so instead of getting uneasy because they dont think like you, you should try and find out how they think, ask them why is this action? Why do you think such?
Another thing that plays into this cooncept that may have crossed your mind, is that you first wish that this person would act like you, when they do this unexpected act of puking in your car, you wish they would think like you. So your job is to be that person that you wish existed, someone that would think, or try to think like you, but for this other person.
Another concept that could be addressed here, is that instead of the driver getting angry, at the action of the passenger (puking), the driver automatically wishes that the passenger thought like him. But if the passenger had done something good, the driver may tolerate the different point of view of the passenger, or consider it and disregard. OR depending on the impression that the action of the passenger gives, the driver may even wish to think like the passenger.
So there are three cases:
1) the driver gets angry, (wishes the paassenger thought like him)
2) the driver disregards (only tolerates the passenger’s point of view)
3) the driver... (wishes to think like the passenger)
The open minded option is to always wish to know and understand the thoughts, world, and philosophy of others. But often even though something is beautiful, it is quickly disregarded, (depending on the interest of the observer). Then it is possible that the observer is actually repulsed by something so that they try to not accept something. Whenever somehting repulses you, you are closing your mind to it.
So these results depend on the openness of the observer, my question is, how do I find out which actions are repulsive, ok, or intriguing, to the observer; I expect it to be different for every observer.
I think to find this out, I must use my assumption of language, language uses symbols to represent a certain idea, you can use representatives (instead of the actual action), to get a little a representation of their reaction to it. But sometimes people lie, so I have to figure out why people lie.My fellow Whittie here says, “People lie because it is not in their best interest to tell the truth.” So the symbols that you give that would represent the situation, should have a reflection that makes telling the truth their best interest. I dont know how to reflect this though.
I am more concerned about the possibilities rather than likeliness, because likeliness changes depending on context, but possibilities are always possible.
Excitement is an accomplishment through inhibitions, no inhibitions, equals no excitement..
I am still concerned about: how do I let others know of my layback? How do I appear vulnerable?
What does it mean, when someone tries to regain themselves?; in “threat” terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment