File Location: My Words/Completion (What we know)/Subject Matter (knowledge)
To begin this subject I am going to start off with pointing out the problems in science and the pomp of human minds when it comes to, discovering and knowing the world. It is true we are able to predict certain things and its true that, for the most part and only for the most part, it comes out true. Scientific results are existant, there is no denying it, but the results of scientific experiments are only accepted because of the tendencies of the physical world; tendencies are invalid support when trying to justify something logically. And even if it was true that science had Eternal incorruptible results and predictions, still what do we really know about the world? Does being able to predict certain things make us dignified of worship? Does this mean that we understand how the world works, what it is made of? And does this say that we can control the world , our lives and our destiny? Does this make us gods? Materialist atheist scientist seem to think so since they have developed the pride to say that humans will inevitably know everything at some point in the life of humanity, that it is a sure proven Truth that there is no God. How can people believe that the human mind can understand the wonderous utter infinity of Reality? Saying that a human mind understands reality would be like saying that a rock understands the complete complexities of consciousness. Atheism developed from “logic” and “science” is as much a scam as christianity is, as portrayed in “Zeitgeist”.
To begin this subject I am going to start off with pointing out the problems in science and the pomp of human minds when it comes to, discovering and knowing the world. It is true we are able to predict certain things and its true that, for the most part and only for the most part, it comes out true. Scientific results are existant, there is no denying it, but the results of scientific experiments are only accepted because of the tendencies of the physical world; tendencies are invalid support when trying to justify something logically. And even if it was true that science had Eternal incorruptible results and predictions, still what do we really know about the world? Does being able to predict certain things make us dignified of worship? Does this mean that we understand how the world works, what it is made of? And does this say that we can control the world , our lives and our destiny? Does this make us gods? Materialist atheist scientist seem to think so since they have developed the pride to say that humans will inevitably know everything at some point in the life of humanity, that it is a sure proven Truth that there is no God. How can people believe that the human mind can understand the wonderous utter infinity of Reality? Saying that a human mind understands reality would be like saying that a rock understands the complete complexities of consciousness. Atheism developed from “logic” and “science” is as much a scam as christianity is, as portrayed in “Zeitgeist”.
The way that we live everyday life, does not show that we know anything about reality, but only shows that we have fooled ourselves to think that the world is real and consistent . Of course the world that is observed seems to be real and consistent, but its only accord to human minds and senses. I am proclaiming that we only know what is given to us, only what is fed to us by our senses; but what our senses tell us has nothing to do with reality and the world. What we live by is only hope that things exist, and we are in denial to admit that there is no way to prove that the laws of nature are eternally constant or that what we touch is actually solid, or that what we remember has actually happened, there is no way to prove that what we sense is the only things that exist!!! Science is based on assumptions from the beginning, assumptions that scientist themselves have invalidly, without logic, accepted as Truth. Who knows what the world really is, we are not alive enough to know. When we truly use truth for truth, we realize that we live in an unknown world. Nobody knows where we live or where we are. Nobody knows the properties of the unknown, and the unknown is now, the unknown is here the unknown is with us. Knowledge is not even a property of human lives; what is a property of human lives is pretending that knowledge is a property of human lives; delusion and unjustified belief. We do not deserve to live, we do not deserve to say, do not say even a word, do not even look, because your thoughts are a disgrace to Truth, you lie by thinking, and then you lie by saying that your lies are truth, and even worse; you lie by saying that your lies are Truth. But how can I say that we do not know anything, that knowledge for human beings does not exist. The truth is that I know that we know nothing, but the truth is that I do not know, but even then, the Truth is... (I can’t say, my mind is unworthy to declare) the Truth is...
Like Des Cartes I want to start of with foundational beliefs and work towards the external world from there, but unlike epistemology, which goal is to discover what we know as an end, and we MUST know it, I am going to accept those things that we may never know, and point out those things that, human beings may consider true, from those things that human beings may asume in real life to be able to live normally, and such things that we have good reasons to assume but that we must declare that at anytime and any idea, we should give them up. I also want to clarify the reasons why certain things are morally acceptable to assume, for the sake of humanity and life.
Why we believe.
What we know.
What we should look for.
The Truth.
The lies.
Assumptions, that make our universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment